Warning: This is just a fun thought experiment, not actual facts. But it's... suspicious.
Late 2025: US pressures India to stop buying Russian oil. India complies, switching heavily to Middle East โ becomes maximally dependent on Hormuz.
January 2026: US shale companies quietly lock in hedges at $65-70/barrel.
Feb 28: War starts. Hormuz closes. Oil jumps $70 โ $110+.
Who wins? Exxon, Chevron, US LNG exporters โ all posting record profits right now.
By late 2025, US shale was quietly dying:
A war sending oil to $100+? Fixes all of this overnight. No congressional vote needed.
The US doesn't need oil profits. It needs dollar dominance.
What was threatening the petrodollar in 2025?
A Hormuz crisis fixes everything:
One war. Petrodollar restored for a decade.
From "strategic autonomy" to "grateful supplicant" in 14 days. Without firing a shot at India.
Raytheon (RTX): +23% since Feb 28
Lockheed Martin: +19%
Northrop Grumman: +31%
These companies spent $120M lobbying in 2025. The war already generated ~$80B in replacement orders.
ROI: 666x. In two weeks.
Trump declared victory Day 1 even though Hormuz stayed closed.
Because a quick win gives you a one-week oil spike. But a "war that's almost over" gives you:
The perfect war is one that's never actually finished.
Pattern: whenever dollar dominance is threatened via oil... a conflict appears.
Conspiracy score: 7.5/10 โ surprisingly coherent.
But wars are chaotic. The US is getting hurt via inflation too. Trump probably just wanted a legacy foreign policy win.
The boring answer: Aligned incentives. A mix of security concerns, defense lobby pressure, election politics, and hubris produced a war that happens to benefit US interests โ not because it was planned, but because those interests shaped the environment unconsciously.
"Never attribute to conspiracy what can be explained by aligned incentives."